COMPASS
COMPASS is a web-based meta-analytic resource designed to evaluate DNA methylation (DNAm) correspondence between brain tissue and peripheral tissues in a way that does not rely on any single dataset. Recognizing that IMAGE-CpG2 is composed of multiple sub-databases—DB6 (adult biopsy), DB7 (adult autopsy), and DB8 (pediatric)—COMPASS integrates these newly generated data with existing public resources (DB1–5) to enable cross-database queries and synthesis. For a user-specified CpG, COMPASS estimates tissue-pair correlations within each included database across selectable brain regions and peripheral tissue types, and then combines the results using a random-effects meta-analysis to provide more robust and generalizable brain–periphery correlation estimates.
Overview of the statistical workflow (meta-analysis)
In this tool, for a user-specified CpG ID, we evaluate the association between DNAm levels in a brain tissue and a peripheral tissue across multiple datasets. We first compute a within-dataset correlation for the CpG of interest, and then combine the correlations across datasets using meta-analysis. The main statistical steps are as follows.
1. Creating matched individual pairs
For each dataset, brain and peripheral DNAm values are matched at the individual level. Only individuals with an available matched brain–peripheral pair are included in the analysis.
2. Correlation analysis within each dataset
Within each dataset, the association between brain and peripheral DNAm at the specified CpG is quantified using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rho). At the same time, we record the number of matched pairs (n) used to compute the correlation. Datasets with too few matched pairs may be excluded from downstream analyses.
3. Transformation for meta-analysis (Fisher's z transformation)
Because correlation coefficients are not ideal for direct pooling, each dataset-specific Spearman rho is converted to a meta-analysis-friendly scale using Fisher's z transformation. Using the matched-pair sample size (n), we also compute the corresponding uncertainty for each dataset so that datasets with larger sample sizes contribute more strongly to the pooled estimate.
4. Pooling using a random-effects model
The transformed effect sizes are combined using a random-effects meta-analysis model, which accounts for potential between-dataset heterogeneity.
5. Back-transformation and reporting
Although the meta-analysis is performed on the transformed scale, the final pooled estimate is converted back to the correlation-coefficient scale (Spearman rho) for easier interpretation and reporting.